This site is intended for health professionals only

Revealed: Only 10% of unspent ARRS funds redistributed to PCNs

Revealed: Only 10% of unspent ARRS funds redistributed to PCNs
By Beth Gault
11 June 2024



PCNs in England underspent on ARRS funding by more than £45m in the year 2023/24, with only 10% of that redistributed to PCNs, according to figures obtained by FOI.

The freedom of information investigation by our sister title Pulse PCN found that only around £4.4m was reallocated to PCNs, with the remaining £41m retained by NHS England.

The ARRS scheme is part of the Network DES and is allocated to PCNs based on their weighted populations and funds the hiring of non-GP staff, including pharmacists, physiotherapists and paramedics. 

When the money is unspent, ICBs have been able to invite PCNs to bid for any unclaimed funding. However in February, NHS England announced the mechanism for this bidding process would be stopped.

Figures acquired under the Freedom of Information Act suggest that only £4,382,730 of the unspent funding was reallocated under the mechanism in the 2023/24 financial year.

The FOI was sent to ICBs by Pulse PCN, in which 39 out of the 42 ICBs responded. Out of these, 20 had recorded an underspend figure.

Three ICBs (North Central London, Somerset and Derby and Derbyshire) said they did not have the information available yet.

In addition to this, two ICBs (Hampshire and Isle of Wight and Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent) said their underspend figures were not yet available, but stated they had already distributed £5.8m and £1m respectively to PCNs within their areas.

Sussex ICB disputed the term ‘underspend’, stating that it had redistributed all £3.6m of unallocated ARRS funds in October 2023 to be spent by 27 of its 39 PCNs which bid for extra funds.

The total available ARRS funding for PCNs in those ICBs that responded was around £1.28bn.

By proportion of total ARRS funding, those with the highest underspend were Dorset ICB with £3.5m (18%), Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes with £3.6m (15%), and Mid and South Essex, with £3.8m (13.8%) (see box for full breakdown).

Several ICBs also reported an underspend in the previous financial year, 2022/23, according to figures obtained by an FOI from Pulse PCN in 2023. The highest of which were in Kent and Medway, which had £7m underspend and Lincolnshire with £2.1m.

A spokesperson for Dorset ICB stated that recruitment was an issue.

They said: ‘Nationally, various challenges have been cited, such as being unable to recruit to certain roles and a lack of estate to house these roles. In addition, the model of care will affect which roles may be appropriate in certain settings, and therefore the spend of allocation.

‘As at May 2024, Dorset PCNs had recruited over 430 whole time equivalent additional roles across 18 PCNs, which is a huge achievement.

‘Over this financial year, NHS Dorset will continue to support PCNs.’

Levi Buckley, chief delivery officer at North East and North Cumbria ICB, which had almost £7m of underspend, said: ‘As England’s largest ICS and an area with significant rurality and deprivation, we face a number of challenges but have secured more than 2,000 skilled staff through ARRS.

‘Our region was hit hard by the pandemic, which had an impact on our progress in the early years of ARRS. We successfully utilised the total funding allocation for ARRS in 2023-24, and accessed the additional funding earmarked for PCNs – moving from a 22% overall underspend to 9% last year, at the same time as a £20m increase in budget.

‘Our strong recruitment drive has made a big impact but has been held back in some areas by shortages of trained staff in roles like physiotherapy and pharmacy. Some areas had difficulties with accommodation or oncosts, while many PCNs found that without the assurance of a further increase in funding for 2024-25, it was harder to commit to further new posts in a sustainable way.

‘We and our PCNs have worked hard to make the best use of ARRS, and the ICB has allocated as much funding as they were able to utilise as well as offering extra financial flexibility mid-year. The unspent £7m was retained by NHS England, in line with the scheme’s processes.’

A spokesperson for Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes ICB also said PCNs have been ‘actively recruiting’ to ARRS roles, but did not take up all the funding available.

‘Our practices and PCNs continue to recruit to roles eligible for funding via the ARRS, and we will continue to support them.  We look forward to our PCNs continuing their recruitment to these roles during 2024/25.’

A Suffolk and North East Essex ICB spokesperson, said: ‘We work closely with primary care colleagues to ensure practices are able to make best use of the resources available and the aim is for the full use of the ARRS budget in 2024/25.’

Although Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB does not have the confirmed final ARRS underspend figure, James Roach, director of primary care services said: ‘Earlier in 2023/24, NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight identified that there was an underspend in the ARRS and invited PCNs to bid for this.

‘A total of 22 PCNs received a share of the known underspend at the time – £5.8m, which is an average of £264,000 per PCN.’

Hertfordshire and West Essex ICB in relation to this is: ‘The figures provided in response to the FOI request were based on the financial information that was available to us at the time. We cannot give a final definitive figure for our use of ARRS funding for 2023/24 until the final accounts have been signed off.’

Clinical director at Central and West Warrington PCN, Dr Laura Mount, said: ‘My PCN spent their budget but there are many reasons why a PCN may have an underspend. Many PCNs lack the staff and structure to employ a full contingent of ARRS staff. Recruitment to ARRS is limited by the wage cap allowable. Staff are often new to primary care and need supporting through expensive and intense training which is also not funded properly. This means that not all PCNs have the resource to support as many staff as they would like. There is often slippage in year if staff leave or are sick.’

She added that once you develop an underspend you need to be ‘mindful’ to not over recruit the following years, but that it’s a ‘real fine balance to manage’.

‘This year the budget in our PCN has not increased so we currently look to be overspending which is a concern when we know we cannot bid for funds from underspent PCNs this year,’ she added. ‘If there is underspend to be given to us from others we would prefer to know early in the year as its easier to plan and get temporary staff in.’

Ben Gowland, director and principal consultant at Ockham Healthcare, a think tank and consultancy, said it was ‘impossible’ for PCNs to recruit the staff in time to use the full allocation.

‘There has been an underspend every year so far on the ARRS budget, and that’s because the allocation grew significantly for each of those years,’ he said.

‘So even if PCNs use their full allocation they will still underspend as it is impossible for them to have been able to recruit all the new staff on the 1 April.  If they recruit more staff to make up for this during the year, then the full year effect will mean that they will overspend the following year (ie this year).  In previous years PCNs knew they were getting growth the following year so could ‘over-recruit’ knowing they would still be within the following year’s budget, but this year because the budget is essentially flat PCNs have not had this luxury.’

An NHS England spokesperson said: ‘NHS primary care networks are making good use of ARRS, with 37,000 roles under the programme currently in place – 43% higher than our target of 26,000 – and where underspends arise in internal budgets, NHS England seeks to invest these in frontline patient care.’

In 2023/24, the total ARRS funding that was allocated to ICBs was £1.412bn. In 2024/25, that figure has increased slightly to £1.441bn.

The top 10 ICBs with the highest underspend were contacted for comment.

ICB areas where there was ARRS underspend

 

ICB

ARRS allocation

Underspend

Percentage

1

Dorset

£19,000,000

£3,500,000

18.4%

2

Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes

£23,269,000

£3,599,000

15.5%

3

Mid and South Essex

£27,500,000

£3,800,000

13.8%

4

Lincolnshire

£20,382,000

£2,782,000

13.6%

5

Suffolk and North East Essex

£24,900,000

£3,300,000

13.3%

6

Kent and Medway

£45,185,000

£5,185,000

11.5%

7

Hertfordshire and West Essex

£34,618,349

£3,876,289

11.2%

8

Northamptonshire

£18,200,000

£1,800,000

9.9%

9

North East and North Cumbria

£76,429,000

£6,976,000

9.1%

10

North West London

£58,440,000

£2,940,000

5.0%

11

North Central London

£38,556,553

£1,907,394

4.9%

12

Cheshire and Merseyside

£65,782,087

£2,906,106

4.4%

13

Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire:

£22,717,323

£593,557

2.6%

14

Gloucestershire

£13,938,000

£334,103

2.4%

15

Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly

£14,551,651

£322,615

2.2%

16

Greater Manchester

£74,800,000

£1,600,000

2.1%

17

The Black Country

£29,227,790

£61,047

0.2%

18

South West London

£35,178,000

£72,523

0.2%

19

South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw

£33,913,000

£66,000

0.2%

20

Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

£27,994,000

£1,000

0.0%

     

£45,622,634

 

A version of this story was first published on our sister title Pulse PCN.

Want news like this straight to your inbox?

Related articles