A Government review of arm’s length bodies (ALBs), including the NHS England, CQC and UKHSA could see ‘powers returned to accountable ministers’.
The evaluation will look at the efficacy and efficiency of all public bodies and whether they should be ‘abolished or retained’ or should carry on delivering all of their functions.
NHS Improvement, NHS Digital and Health Education England (HEE) also fall under the remit of the review.
It remains unclear when the review – which will be led by government efficiency minister Jacob Rees-Mogg – will begin.
The Cabinet Office published new guidance for a review of public bodies at the end of April that said there is an ‘urgent need for public service reform’.
The guidance said: ‘Reviews will consider whether the body should be abolished or retained; whether it should continue to deliver all of its functions; and whether it has an effective relationship with its department.
‘The outcome of this work should see powers returned to accountable ministers, [and] greater efficiency.’
It added that the review should ‘assess whether there are more efficient and effective alternatives’ for the Government’s aims.
It said: ‘This can include merging the body with a similar body, and closing the body and bringing its functions back to the department.’
It added that ‘ultimately, ministers are accountable to Parliament for the performance and policy framework of their ALBs’, adding that it is ‘essential’ they are confident that ALBs are ‘operating effectively’.
The Government said that reviews will ‘vary in size and scale’, ranging from ‘light-touch exercises largely undertaken via a self-assessment’ to a team supporting a ‘Lead Reviewer on full-scale review’.
The review will be based on four criteria:
- Efficacy – expectations that the ALB has a ‘clear purpose’ in the ‘correct delivery model’
- Governance – expectations to be met by ALB boards
- Accountability – expectations for ‘accountability and communication’ between relevant Government departments and ALBs
- Efficiency – expectations for ‘identifiable cashable efficiency gains’
A similar Government review carried out in 2011 saw ALBs cut their budgets considerably.
In February, the CQC was accused of ‘soliciting negative GP feedback’ after data from its ‘Give feedback on care’ portal showed a 176% rise in complaints.
It came after the regulator admitted its inspections may ‘inadvertently disadvantage’ ethnic minority GPs.
This story first appeared on our sister title, Pulse.